BOSTON — It is a building that has a story to tell, a legacy to pass down.
The BOSTOMAN CENTER is an icon of a century-old movement to build a world where workers are able to design their own homes.
But the building is in the middle of a long and winding history, and its future has been a bit cloudy.
A new book is changing that.
It tells the story of a building built in the 1970s that has helped shape the city it was meant to serve.
The book, by former Boston Globe reporter Mark E. Smith, was published last week by the nonprofit BOSTO Foundation.
Smith is also the author of the 2012 book “Building the Future,” which chronicled the building of Boston’s World Trade Center in the 1990s.
Smith is a former editor at the Boston Globe, a reporter at the Globe and a Pulitzer Prize winner.
He has also been a columnist for The Boston Globe.
Smith’s new book, “Building The Future,” chronicles how Boston and the rest of the country have embraced the notion that everyone can create a home, from scratch.
Smith says it is a way for Boston to reclaim its identity as the birthplace of American capitalism.
He tells The Associated Press he thinks that’s why the building’s story is important.
He says Boston has a lot to be proud of, but that its history can also be instructive.
He points to the city’s founding as an inspiration for its own future.
“Boston was the first city to get a citywide code of conduct, to get an independent agency that is actually in charge of building and managing our own infrastructure, and then the second to get our own city government,” Smith said.
“And now we’re in the process of taking the next step and putting that code of practice in place.”
Smith’s book explores how Boston became a global center for building, from the early 19th century to the 1990’s, and why that building is now one of the most iconic in the city.
The building, now the Boston Convention Center, was designed by architect Frederick Law Olmsted and completed in 1915.
The building was designed for the needs of the people who lived there.
The designers wanted the building to be a place of comfort, quiet, and warmth.
It was designed to serve as a symbol of the modern world, and to be built in a way that would be as environmentally friendly as possible.
The architects designed the building with a specific vision of what people would do in a modern city.
For instance, they wanted the first floors to be occupied by the building itself, rather than with offices or commercial space.
They also wanted to create an environment that was comfortable and inviting, while also being environmentally friendly.
“The idea was to build something that was really meant to be the embodiment of a city and to reflect the people that lived there,” Smith explained.
“Builders are not going to be able to just come and take all of the materials and build a building with the exact same design that we did,” Smith continued.
“That’s not what a building should be.
It’s not going be designed with the same intentions as the design that went into that building.”
Building a new city”Building a future”In the early days of Boston, there was no building with that kind of name.
Instead, the city was built on a huge scale.
The first building built, the BOSTODO, was a massive structure with a footprint of more than 1,000,000 square feet.
But it was built in 1918, not 1918 to 1917, because the first building was still under construction.
Smith says that was because the city needed to create a building for a specific purpose.
“It was a building designed to be used for the people of Boston,” Smith says.
“The building itself was designed as a place to get their information and information and communication.
They needed that information, and they needed to be connected to the outside world and to the public in a more meaningful way.”
Smith says Boston was able to do all of those things because it was a modern, innovative city.
He cites the city as one of those places that, despite being a new place, has been able to become a city in a very short time.
“Because of the newness of the city and the pace of change, Boston has been very successful,” Smith explains.
“But it is not as successful as New York or San Francisco.”
Building the future”Building the new cityThat success has been fueled by a desire for a new type of architecture.
Smith points to what he says is one of Bostons greatest architectural successes.”
You could call it the ‘Build the Future’ project,” Smith tells AP.”
We’re very fortunate in that it was the original architect of the building, Frederick Olmstead, who designed